The MADELEINE project
  /
  /

Bibliography

  1. Jameson, A., Aerodynamic design via control theory, Journal of Scientific Computing, 3(3) 233-260, 1988.
  2. Abbas-Bayoumi, A. and Becker, K., An industrial view on numerical simulation for aircraft aerodynamic design, Journal of Mathematics in Industry 1:10, 2011.
  3. Slotnick, J., Khodadoust, A., Alonso, J., Darmofal, D., Gropp, W., Lurie, E. and Mavriplis, D., CFD Vision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences, NASA Technical Report CR-2014-218178, NF1676L-18332.
  4. Roge G., Shape optimisation for greener aircraft: the Dassault Aviation vision and perspectives, ECCOMAS 2016, June 5-10, Crete.
  5. Asouti V. G., Trompoukis X., Kampolis, I.C. and Giannakoglou K. C., Unsteady CFD computations using vertex-centered finite volumes for unstructured grids on Graphics Processing Unit, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 2011; 67:232-246, DOI: 10.1002/fld.2352.
  6. Shahigh pressurear, S. and Caloni, S., Adjoint Optimisation of a High Pressure Turbine Stage for a Lean-Burn Combustion System, 10th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Lappeenranta, Finland, 15-19 April 2013.
  7. Nielsen E.J., Diskin B. and Yamaleev N.K., Discrete adjoint-based design optimisation of unsteady turbulent flows on dynamic unstructured grids, AIAA Journal 48(6) June 2010.
  8. Brezillon J. and Dwight R.P., Applications of a discrete viscous adjoint method for aerodynamic shape optimisation of 3D configurations, CEAS Jal 3:25-34. 2012-09-27.
  9. Méheut M., Arntz A., Carrier G., Aerodynamic shape optimisation of a blended wing body configuration for several wing planforms, AIAA Paper 2012-3122.
  10. Palacios F., Alonso J.J., Colonno M., Hicken J., Lucakzyk T., Adjoint-based method for supersonic aircraft design using equivalent area distribution, AIAA Paper 2012-0269.
  11. Kenway G. K. W. and Martins J. R. R. A., Multi-Point High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimisation of a Transport Aircraft Configuration, Journal of Aircraft, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.C032150
  12. Zymaris A.S., Papadimitriou D.I., Giannakoglou K.C., Othmer C., Adjoint Wall Functions: A New Concept for Use in Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 229, pp. 5228-5245, 2010.
  13. Achard T., Blondeau C. and Ohayon R., An Uncoupled Approach to Compute Aero-Structure Gradients Using High-Fidelity CFD-CSM, 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Conference, AIAA 2016-4121, 2016.
  14. Abu-Zurayk M., Ilic C., Schuster A. and Liepelt R., Effect of gradient approximations on aero-structural gradient-based wing optimization submitted to EUROGEN 2017.
  15. Merle A., Stück A. and Rempke A., An Adjoint-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation Strategy for trimmed Aircrafts with active Engines, AVIATION 2017, June 2017, Denver, CO.
  16. Samareh J.A., A Survey of Shape Parameterisation Techniques. Technical Report. NASA, 1999.
  17. Amoignon O., Hradil J. and N.avratil J., A numerical study of adaptive FFD in aerodynamic shape optimisation, AIAA Paper 2014-0899
  18. Bletzinger K.-U., A consistent frame for sensitivity filtering and the vertex assigned morphing of optimal shape, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 873-895, 2014.
  19. Polynkin A., Toropov V. and Shaphar S., Multidisciplinary Optimisation of turbomachinary based on metamodel built by Genetic Programming, in 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscip. Anal. Optim. Conf, 2010.
  20. Viti A., Druot T. and Dumont A., Aero-structural approach coupled with direct operative cost optimisation for new aircraft concept in preliminary design, 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Conference, AIAA 2016-3512, 2016.
  21. Salah El Din I., Dumont A. and Blondeau C., Transonic Wing-body Civil Transport Aircraft Aero-Structural Design Optimisation using a Bi-Level High Fidelity Approach - A Focus on the Aerodynamic Process, 51st AIAA ASM, Grapevine, Texas, January 2013.
  22. Jovanov K., De Breuker R., M. Abdala and Blondeau C., A Linear Aerodynamics-based preconditionner for high-fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis, 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Conference 2016, Washington.
  23. Economon T., Palacios F., and Alonso J., A Coupled-Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic and Aero-acoustic Optimisation, AIAA Paper 2012-5598.
  24. Rallabhandi S.K., Application of adjoint methodology in various aspects of sonic boom design, 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2014-2271). doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2271.
  25. Fabiano E., Mishra A., Mavriplis D.J., and Mani K.., Time-dependent Aero-acoustic Adjoint-based Shape Optimisation of Helicopter Rotors in Forward Flight, 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, (AIAA 2016-1910). doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1910.
  26. Marinc D. and Foysi H., Investigation of a continuous adjoint-based optimisation procedure for aero-acoustic control of plane jets, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 38, pp. 200-212, 2012.
  27. Schulze J., Sesterhenn J., Optimal distribution of porous media to reduce trailing edge noise, Computers & Fluids, Vol. 78, 20 April 2013, Pages 41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.022
  28. Song, Y., Guo, Z., Song, L., Li, J. and Feng, Z., Multi-objective and multi-disciplinary optimisation of gas turbine blade profile and cooling system using conjugate heat transfer analysis, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, paper GT2014-25495, 2014.
  29. Giannakoglou K.C., Papadimitriou D.I., Papoutsis-Kiachagias E.M., and Kavvadias I.S., Aerodynamic shape optimisation using “turbulent” adjoint and robust design in fluid mechanics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, 38:289-309, 2015.
  30. Walther B.A. and Nadarajah S.B. An adjoint-based multi-point optimisation method for robust turbomachinery design. volume 2B, 2015
  31. Pini M., Persico G., and Dossena V., Robust adjoint-based shape optimisation of supersonic turbo- machinery cascades. Vol. 2B, 2014.
  32. Shankaran S.A. and Marta A.B., Robust optimisation for aerodynamic problems using polynomial chaos and adjoints. volume 8, pages 2217-2227, 2012
  33. Allaire G., Jouve F. and Michailidis G., Casting constraints in structural optimisation via a level-set method, 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation, May 19 - 24, 2013, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  34. Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., Gradient-based adjoint and design of experiment CFD methodologies to improve the manufacturability of high pressure turbine blades, Proc. ASME Turbo Expo 2016, June 13-17, 2016, Seoul, South Korea.
  35. Martins J.R.R.A. Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation: A Survey of Architectures. AIAA Journal, Vol 51 (2013), No. 9, pp. 2049-2075
  36. Kenway G., Kennedy G., Martins J. Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Steady-State Aeroelastic Analysis and Adjoint Derivative Computations. AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 5 (2014), pp. 935-951
  37. Jakobsson S. and Amoignon O., Mesh deformation using radial basis functions for gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimisation, Computers & Fluids 36 (2007) 1119-1136
  38. Wang Y, Qin N, Zhao N, Delaunay graph and radial basis function for fast quality mesh deformation, Journal of Computational Physics, 294:149-172 01 August 2015.
  39. Scheng C. and Allen C.B., Efficient mesh deformation using radial basis functions on unstructured meshes, AIAA Journal, Vl.51, No.3, March 2013.
  40. Batina J.T., Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Journal, Vol. 28, No8, pp1381-1388, 1990.
  41. Maruyama D., Bailly D., Carrier G., High-Quality Mesh Deformation Using Quaternions for Orthogonality Preservation, AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 12 (2014), pp.2712-2729.
  42. Bobrowski K., Ferrery E., Valero E. and Barnewitz H., CAD-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation Using Geometry Surrogate Model And Adjoint Methods, 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Conference 2016.
  43. Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., Gradient-based adjoint and design of experiment CFD methodologies to improve the manufacturability of high pressure turbine blades, Proc. ASME Turbo Expo 2016, June 13-17, 2016, Seoul, South Korea.
  44. ProCAST: https://www.esi-group.com/software-solutions/virtual-manufacturing/casting-simulation-software
  45. https://www.esi-group.com/software-solutions/virtual-manufacturing/additive-manufacturing).
  46. Koch J.R.L., Papoutsis-Kiachagias E.M., Giannakoglou K.C., Transition from Adjoint Level Set Topology to Shape Optimisation for 2D Fluid Mechanics, Computers & Fluids, Vol. 150, 123-138, 2017.
  47. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J., Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS), NASA/TM-1998-208715.
  48. Hanson D.B., Helicoidal Surface Theory for Harmonic Noise of Propellers in the Far Field, AIAA Journal 1980, Vol.18, No. 10, pp 1213-1220.
  49. European Commission, FlightPath 2050 Europe’s Vision for Aviation – Report of the High Level Group on Aviation Research, Luxembourg, 2011.
  50. ACARE, Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA), 2017 update, Volume 1.
  51. Gazaix, A., Gallard, F., Gachelin, V., et al., Towards the industrialization of new MDO methodologies and tools for aircraft design, AVIATION 2017, Jun. 2017, Denver, CO.
  52. Clausen A., Aage N., Sigmund O., Topology optimization of coated structures and material interface problems, Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:524–541. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.011
  53. Wadbro E., Analysis and design of acoustic transition sections for impedance matching and mode conversion, Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(3):395–408. doi:10.1007/s00158-014-1058-2
  54. Elesin Y., Lazarov B.S., Jensen J.S., Sigmund O., Time domain topology optimization of 3d nanophotonic devices, Photonics Nanostruct Fundam Appl 12(1):23–33. doi:10.1016/j.photonics.2013.07.008
  55. Yoon G.H., Topology optimization for stationary fluid–structure interaction problems using a new monolithic formulation, Int J Numer Methods Eng 82:591–616. doi:10.1002/nme.2777
  56. Girardeau J., Pailhes J., Sebastian P., Pardo F., Nadeau J.P., Turbine Blade Cooling System Optimization, Journal of Turbomachinery - Vol. 135, n°6, p.061020-061020, 2013.
  57. Jespersen D.C., Acceleration of a CFD Code with a GPU, NAS Technical Report NAS-09-003, Nov. 2009.
  58. Haselbach, F., Newby, A., Parker, R., Concepts & Technologies For The Next Generation Of Large Civil Aircraft Engines, Proceeding of the 29th ICAS (International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences), ICAS-2014-0078, St Petersburg, Russia. 2014.
  59. Keye S., Klimmek T., Abu-Zurayk M., Schulze M., Ilic C.; „Aero-Structural Optimization of the NASA Common Research Model“, 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference Denver, Colorado, AIAA Paper 2017-4145, 2017